Viewing of the documentary “Murderball.”
- Discussions on its modern treatment:
- Non-linear story telling
- Pacing of the film between intervals of sports action, hard facts and diagrammatic explanations, quiet intimate moments and humor
- Invasive and confessional insights about the subjects with raw language and emotions
- Comparisons between devices utilized in this film (that are more in tune to today’s generation) and their parallels in feature writing:
- Letting the subjects speak the most controversial assertions (quotes) and explain their condition with no narrator to manipulate viewer’s judgment (objectivity).
- Literary approach to non-fiction (ala Truman Capote’s “novelized non-fiction”).
- Imagining what goes into making a compelling, thorough and well-crafted non-fictional story such as this:
- How does one make a compelling documentary about disabled? If you were given just the premise without having watched the film, would consider the subject matter as boring and as something you cannot relate with?
- What was edited out to make the story more exciting and to give it a twist?
- How different would this documentary be if it were done twenty years ago? Would it be still use a non-linear narrative? Would it pity or glorify them? Or would it still candidly portray the disabled with all their faults as this film does?
- How did the documentarians gain the trust of the subjects to candidly go through their daily lives and attain uncontrived vignettes?
Objectives:
- To show the potential for a compelling story in even the most difficult subject matters.
- To illustrate contemporary approaches to journalism.
No comments:
Post a Comment